翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ In Pictures (song)
・ In Pieces
・ In Pieces (song)
・ In Pine Effect
・ In Pit Lane
・ In Place Apart
・ In Place of Real Insight
・ In Place of Strife
・ In Plain Sight
・ In Plus Group Ltd v Pyke
・ In Position
・ In Practice
・ In Praise of Copying
・ In Praise of Cosmetics
・ In Praise of Dreams
In Praise of Hard Industries
・ In Praise of Idleness and Other Essays
・ In Praise of Learning
・ In Praise of Limestone
・ In Praise of Love
・ In Praise of Love (film)
・ In Praise of Love (play)
・ In Praise of More (album)
・ In Praise of Older Women
・ In Praise of Older Women (1978 film)
・ In Praise of Older Women and Other Crimes
・ In Praise of Pip
・ In Praise of Shadows
・ In Praise of Slow
・ In Praise of the Stepmother


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

In Praise of Hard Industries : ウィキペディア英語版
In Praise of Hard Industries

''In Praise of Hard Industries'' is a book about the economic impact of fewer manufacturing jobs in the United States written by Irish journalist and author Eamonn Fingleton. It was published in 1999. The book was reissued in a 2003 paperback edition under the title ''Unsustainable: How Economic Dogma Is Destroying American Prosperity''.
The book argues that the shift in the American work-force from industry to knowledge workers was setting the country up for an economic collapse. It criticizes financial innovation as a ruse to sell complex financial instruments and urged for more advanced manufacturing in the United States. The book argues that industrial activities create jobs and exports, and that job salaries would be protected in environments using high-end equipment.
In its first chapter, the book enunciates the “Three Strikes Against the New Economy”: a bad job mix, slow income growth. and a dearth of exports.
==Reception==
The book elicited strong and mixed responses. Liberal economist James K. Galbraith said in ''The New York Times'' that Fingleton was “the sort of journalist economists despise,” arguing that the book was “anecdotal, spurning statistics or other corroboration” and that it overstated the decline of American manufacturing. Conservative economist George C. Leef commented that his snap judgment based on the cover was that it was “a lousy book” and that upon reading it, it “turned out to be far worse than I had guessed.”
Economist Paul Craig Roberts〔 and activist Loren Goldner both supported the book's message. Roberts viewed the book as substantially vindicated by the Wall Street crash of 2007-2008 as well as by the earlier dot.com bust of the late 1990s.〔Paul Craig Roberts, "How the Economy was Lost" ''Counterpunch'' Feb. 24, 2009 ()〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「In Praise of Hard Industries」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.